Skip to main content

Impacts on Cognitive Decay and Memory Recall During Long Duration Spaceflight

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Human Factors in Training, Education, and Learning Sciences (AHFE 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 269))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1101 Accesses

Abstract

Living and working in outer space introduces unique physiological, psychological, and psychosocial stressors to the human body. While most stressors are known and well researched, Long Duration Spaceflight creates additional and more worrisome stressors. This paper describes preparation and research plans for a 30-month repeated-measures, cognitive decay, and memory recall study utilizing ten practical space mission tasks performed by 32 astronaut-like subjects in an Isolation, Confined and Extreme (ICE) analogous environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Stanley, G., Love, R.P.H.: Crew autonomy for deep space exploration - Lessons from the Antarctic Search for Meteorites (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Garrett-Bakelman, F.E., et al.: The NASA twins study: a multidimensional analysis of a year-long human spaceflight. Sci. 364(6436), eaau8650 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pieters, M.A., Zaal, P.M.T.: Training for Long-duration space missions: a literature review into skill retention and generalizability. IFAC PapersOnLine 52(19), 247–252 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fisher, J.S., Radvansky, G.A.: Patterns of forgetting. J. Mem. Lang. 102, 130–141 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dempsey, D.L., Barshi, I.K.P.: Evidence report: risk of performance errors due to training deficiencies. risk statement: Given that existing training methods and paradigms may inadequately prepare long-duration, autonomous crews to execute their mission, there is a risk that increased flight and ground crew errors and inefficiencies, failed mission and program objectives, and increased crew injuries will occur (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Roberts, D.R., et al.: Effects of spaceflight on astronaut brain structure as indicated on MRI. N Engl. J. Med. 377(18), 1746–1753 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dempsey, D.L., Barshi, I.: Applying Research-Based Training Principles: Towards Crew-Centered, Mission-Oriented Space Flight Training. Training for a Mars Mission (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Stuster, J.W., et al.: Human Exploration of Mars: Preliminary Lists of Crew Tasks (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Moore, M., et al.: Simulation Based Investigation of High Latency Space Systems Operations (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rader, S.N., et al.: Human-in-the-loop operations over time delay: lessons learned. In: International Conference on Environmental Systems (ICES), NASA Center for AeroSpace Information (CASI), Vail, CO (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gushin, V.I., Yusupova, A.K., Shved, D.M., Shueva, L.V., Vinokhodova, A.G., Bubeev, Y.A.: The evolution of methodological approaches to the psychological analysis of the crew communications with Mission Control Center (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Orgel, C., et al.: Scientific results and lessons learned from an integrated crewed Mars exploration simulation at the Rio Tinto Mars analogue site (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gershman, B., et al.: Low-latency teleoperations for human exploration and evolvable mars campaign. In: IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lupisella, M.L., Bobskill, M.R.: Human Mars Surface Science Operations (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cowan, N., Rachev, N.R.: Merging with the path not taken: Wilhelm Wundt’s work as a precursor to the embedded-processes approach to memory, attention, and consciousness (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Murre, J.M., Dros, J.: Replication and analysis of Ebbinghaus’ forgetting curve. PLoS One 10(7), e0120644 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fuchs, A.H.: Ebbinghaus’s Contributions to Psychology after 1885 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stuster, J., et al.: Generalizable Skills and Knowledge for Exploration Missions - Final Report (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Landon, L.B., et al.: Selecting astronauts for long-duration exploration missions: Considerations for team performance and functioning. REACH Rev. Hum. Space Explor. 5, 33–56 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fiore, S.M., et al.: Critical Team Cognitive Processes for Long-Duration Exploration Missions, Institute for Simulation and Training: NASA (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kaiser, M.: A tutorial in connectome analysis: topological and spatial features of brain networks. NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.) 57(3), 892–907 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tompson, S.H., et al.: Functional brain network architecture supporting the learning of social networks in humans. NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.) 210, 116498 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang, W., et al.: Dynamic reconfiguration of functional topology in human brain networks: from resting to task states. Neural Plast. 2020, 1–13 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Stam, C.J., van Straaten, E.C.W.: The organization of physiological brain networks. Clin. Neurophysiol. 123(6), 1067–1087 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Goldberg, J.H.: Training for long duration space missions (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rasmussen, J.: Skills, rules, and knowledge; signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybernet. SMC-13(3), 257–266 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Fleming, E., Pritchett, A.: SRK as a framework for the development of training for effective interaction with multi-level automation. Cogn. Technol. Work 18(3), 511–528 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-016-0376-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Baguley, T.: Calculating and graphing within-subject confidence intervals for ANOVA. Behav. Res. Methods 44(1), 158–175 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kelley, C.R.: What is adaptive training? Hum. Factors 11(6), 547–556 (1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. O’Keefe, W.: Training Concept for Long Duration Space Mission, NASA (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Cuevas, H.M., Schmorrow, D.D.: Exploring Cognitive Readiness in Complex Operational Environments: Advances in Theory and Practice (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Gallego-Durán, F.J., Molina-Carmona, R., Llorens-Largo, F.: Measuring the difficulty of activities for adaptive learning. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 17(2), 335–348 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Aidman, E.: Cognitive fitness framework: towards assessing, training and augmenting individual-difference factors underpinning high-performance cognition. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 13(466), 466–466 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Terry Rector .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Rector, T., Cripe, C., Casler, J. (2021). Impacts on Cognitive Decay and Memory Recall During Long Duration Spaceflight. In: Nazir, S., Ahram, T.Z., Karwowski, W. (eds) Advances in Human Factors in Training, Education, and Learning Sciences. AHFE 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 269. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80000-0_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics