Skip to main content

Sublime

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy

Abstract

In early modern thought, the sublime is a great or noble quality of literature or art, which is characterized by an irresistible and overwhelming effect and which produces strong and often conflicting emotions such as awe, fear, and admiration in its recipients. From the mid-sixteenth century onwards, a growing interest in Pseudo-Longinus’ Greek treatise Peri hypsous (On the Sublime) emerged throughout Europe. The sublime as described by Longinus had an inherently dual nature: it could be seen as a type of style with corresponding stylistic devices and prescripts, as well as a ravishing and transporting effect, which emerges from genius and defies the rules of style. In the course of the seventeenth century, the latter interpretation of the Longinian sublime gained the upper hand and fuelled debates on the effects of literature, and later also of art, architecture, music, and spectacle. Besides Longinus’ theory of sublimity, the early modern sublime was also shaped by the religious notion of sacer horror, the natural philosophy of Lucretius and Pascal’s idea of infinity, and operated in a web of neighboring concepts such as magnificence, le merveilleux, la meraviglia, and le je ne sais quoi.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adam, Antoine, and Françoise Escal. 1966. Nicolas Boileau. Oeuvres completes. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanc, Jan. 2016. Sensible natures: Allart van Everdingen and the tradition of sublime landscape in seventeenth-century Dutch painting. Journal of Historians of Netherlandish Art. https://doi.org/10.5092/jhna.2016.8.2.4.

  • Brody, Jules. 1958. Boileau and Longinus. Geneva: Droz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownlee, Kevin. 1984. Phaeton’s fall and Dante’s ascent. Dante Studies 102: 135–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bussels, Stijn P.M. 2016. Theories of the sublime in the Dutch Golden Age. Franciscus Junius, Joost van den Vondel & Petrus Wittewrongel. Journal of the History of European Ideas. https://doi.org/10.1080/01916599.2016.1161532. Accessed 17 May 2016.

  • Bussels, Stijn P.M., and Bram van Oostveldt. 2017. The sublime and French seventeenth-century theories on spectacle: Towards an aesthetic approach of performance. Theatre Survey 58 (2): 209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bussels, Stijn P.M., Bram van Oostveldt, and Wieneke L. Jansen. 2016. Introduction. The Longinian sublime in early seventeenth-century theories of art and literature. Lias Journal of Early Modern Intellectual Culture and its Sources 43 (2): 191–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, Peter A., and Price, Martin, eds. 1988. The Seven Wonders of the Ancient World. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costelloe, Timothy M., ed. 2012. The sublime. From antiquity to the present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronk, Nicolas. 2002. The classical sublime: French neoclassicism and the language of literature. Charlottesville: Rockwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daston, Lorraine, and Katherine Park. 1998. Wonders and the order of nature: 1150–1750. New York: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Declercq, Gilles. 1994. Boileau-Huet: la Querelle du Fiat Lux’. In Pierre-Daniel Huet (1630–1721). Actes du colloque de Caen (12–13 November 1993), ed. Suzanne Guellouz, 237–262. Paris/Seattle/Tübingen (= Biblio 17).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekoninck, Ralph, and Delfosse, Annick. 2016. Sacer horror: The construction and experience of the sublime in the Jesuit festivities of the early seventeenth-century Southern Netherlands. Journal of Historians of Netherlandish Art. https://doi.org/10.5092/jhna.2016.8.2.9.

  • Delbeke, Maarten. 2012. Elevated twins and the vicious sublime. Gianlorenzo Bernini and Louis XIV. In Translations of the sublime. The early modern reception and dissemination of Longinus’ Peri Hupsous in rhetoric, the visual arts, architecture and the theatre, ed. Caroline van Eck, Maarten Delbeke, Jürgen Pieters, and Stijn P.M. Bussels, 117–137. Leiden/Boston: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delehanty, Ann T. 2005. From judgment to sentiment: Changing theories of the sublime, 1674–1710. Modern Language Quarterly 66 (2): 151–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doran, Robert. 2015. The theory of the sublime from Longinus to Kant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fumaroli, Marc. 1996. Héros et orateurs. Rhétorique et dramaturgie cornélienne, 389. Geneva: Droz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilby, Emma. 2006. Sublime worlds. Early modern French literature. London: Legenda.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilby, Emma. 2007. Pseudo-Longin. De la sublimité du discours. Traduction inédite du XViie siècle introduite, éditée & annotée. Chambéry: L’Act Mem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilby, Emma. 2016. Where to draw the line? Longinus, Goulu and Balzac’s Lettres. Lias Journal of Early Modern Intellectual Culture and its Sources 43(2): 225–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, Erik. 2015. The sublime Seneca. Ethics, literature, metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hache, Sophie. 2000. La langue du ciel: Le sublime en France au XVIIe siècle. Paris: Champion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huss, Bernard. 2011. Anmerkungen zur Rezeption von Longins ‘Erhabenem’ im Cinquecento. Romanistisches Jahrbuch 62: 165–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, Wieneke L. 2016. Defending the poet. The reception of On the Sublime in Daniel Heinsius’ Prolegomena on Hesiod. Lias: Journal of Early Modern Intellectual Culture and its Sources 43 (2): 199–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerslake, Lawrence. 2000. Essays on the sublime: Analyses of French writings on the sublime from Boileau to La Harpe. Bern: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langdon, Helen. 2012. The demosthenes of painting. Salvator Rosa and the 17th-century sublime. In Translations of the sublime. The early modern reception and dissemination of Longinus’ Peri Hupsous in rhetoric, the visual arts, architecture and the theatre, eds. Caroline van Eck, Maarten Delbeke, Jürgen Pieters, and Stijn P. M. Bussels, 163–185. Leiden/Boston: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Eva Madeleine. 2012. The “prehistory” of the sublime in early modern France: An interdisciplinary perspective. In The sublime. From antiquity to the present, ed. Timothy M. Costelloe, 77–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Melion, Walter S. 2016. Sublima Dona – Sublimia Mysteria: The sublimity of divine speech in Jerónimo Nadal’s adnotationes et meditationes in evangelia. Journal of Historians of Netherlandish Art. https://doi.org/10.5092/jhna.2016.8.2.8.

  • Merrix, Robert P. 1987. The Phaëton allusion in Richard II: The search for identity. English Literary Renaissance 17 (3): 277–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michel, Alain. 1986. Sublime et parole de Dieu: De Saint Augustin à Fénelon. Revue d’Histoire littéraire de la France 1: 52–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nativel, Colette. 2016. Lectures du Traité du sublime par Franciscus Junius F.F. Lias: Journal of Early Modern Intellectual Culture and its Sources 43 (2): 263–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nau, Clelia. 2005. Le temps du sublime: Longin et le paysage poussinien. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norbrook, David. 1999. Writing the English Republic: Poetry, rhetoric, and politics 1627–1660. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otto, Rudolf. 1980. The idea of the holy: An inquiry into the non-rational factor in the idea of the divine and its relation to the rational. Trans. J.W. Harvey. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, James I. 2007. Lucretius and the sublime. In The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius, eds. Stuart Gillespie and Philip Hardie, 167–184. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, James I. 2016. The sublime in antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Prien, Hans-Jürgen. 2017. Sublimis Deus. In Encyclopedia of Christianity online, ed. Erwing Fahlbusch et al. Leiden/Boston: Brill. http://referenceworks.brillonline.com/browse/encyclopedia-of-christianity. Accessed 7 Mar 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quadlbauer, Franz. 1958. Die genera dicendi bis Plinius d.J. Wiener Studien 51: 55–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Refini, Eugenio. 2012. Longinus and poetic imagination in late renaissance literary theory. In Translations of the sublime. The early modern reception and dissemination of Longinus’ Peri Hupsous in rhetoric, the visual arts, architecture and the theatre, ed. Caroline van Eck, Maarten Delbeke, Jürgen Pieters, and Stijn P.M. Bussels, 33–53. Leiden/Boston: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholar, Richard. 2010. Le-je-ne-sais-quoi. Enquête sur une énigme, 19–48. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, Virginia. 1994. The Fall of Phaeton: The son of the sun god in the theatre of the sun king. French Studies 48(2): 143–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheers Seidenstein, Joanna. 2016. Grace, genius, and the Longinian sublime in Rembrandt’s Aristotle with a bust of Homer. Journal of Historians of Netherlandish Art. https://doi.org/10.5092/jhna.2016.8.5.

  • Shuger, Debora. 1988. Sacred rhetoric: The Christian grand style in the English renaissance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Till, Dietmar. 2006. Das doppelte Erhabene: Eine Argumentationsfigur von der Antike bis zum Beginn des 19. Jahrhunderts. Tübingen: Niemeyer Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • van Eck, Caroline, Maarten Delbeke, Jürgen Pieters, and Stijn Bussels, eds. 2012. Translations of the sublime. The early modern reception and dissemination of Longinus’ Peri Hupsous in rhetoric, the visual arts, architecture and the theatre. Leiden/Boston: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oostveldt van Bram, and Stijn P.M. Bussels. 2016. Introduction: The sublime and seventeenth-century Netherlandish art. Journal of Historians of Netherlandish Art. https://doi.org/10.5092/jhna.2016.8.2.1.

  • Weststeijn, Thijs. 2015. Art and antiquity in the Netherlands and Britain: The vernacular arcadia of Franciscus Junius (1591–1677) (Studies in Netherlandish art and cultural history 12). Leiden/Boston: Brill.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weststeijn, Thijs. 2016. The sublime and the “Beholder’s Share”: Junius, Rubens, Rembrandt. Journal of Historians of Netherlandish Art. https://doi.org/10.5092/jhna.2016.8.2.2.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stijn Bussels .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Bussels, S., van Oostveldt, B., Jansen, W., Knegtel, F., Plezier, L. (2018). Sublime. In: Sgarbi, M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_1136-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_1136-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02848-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02848-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics