Abstract
In Renaissance thought, we can observe a growing interest in and to a certain extent a rehabilitation of the notion of pleasure. This new interest can be understood as an expression of a general trait of Renaissance culture that showed a greater openness towards worldly pleasures than previous times, but it was also inspired by newly rediscovered texts containing Epicurean philosophy. In the course of the fifteenth century, new sources became available, such as Lucretius’ De rerum natura and Diogenes Laertius’ De vita et moribus philosophorum, which supported the growing engagement with Epicurean philosophy and a rehabilitation of his concept of pleasure. Humanists used different routes to rehabilitate the Epicurean notion of pleasure. One strategy was to reinterpret Epicurus’s position and to level the differences with other schools of thought. Another one was to use the Epicurean notion of pleasure in order to counter rigid Stoic moral philosophy and reinterpret Christian morality, as can be seen most prominently in the works of Lorenzo Valla and Erasmus of Rotterdam. Although Renaissance authors contributed to the recognition of Epicurean pleasure, it still took some time before Epicurus and the notion of pleasure became fully accepted in Western philosophical thought.
References
Primary Literature
Abelard, Petrus. 1995. Collationes sive Dialogus inter Philosophum, Iudaeum et Christianum/Gespräch eines Philosophen, eines Juden und eines Christen (lt./dt.), ed. Hans-Wolfgang Krautz. Frankfurt.
Bruni, Leonardo. 1928. Isagogicon moralis philosophiae. In Leonardo Bruni, Humanistisch-philosophische Schriften, ed. Hans Baron. Leipzig: B.G. Teubner.
de Quevedo, Francisco. 1635. Epicteto y Phocilides en Españo con consonantes: Con el origen de los estoicos, y su defensa contra Plutarco, y la defensa de Epicuro, contra la comun opinion. Barcelona: Sapera.
Ficino, Marsilio. 1576. Opera Omnia, 2 vols. Basel (repr. Torino 1959).
Gassendi, Pierre. 1964. Opera Omnia, 6 vols. Stuttgart/Bad Cannstatt: Friedrich Frommann Verlag (repr. of Lyon 1658).
Gassendi, Pierre. 1972. Selected works. Trans. Craig Brush. New York: Johnson Reprints.
John of Salisbury. 1938. Frivolities of courtiers and footprints of philosophers, ed. J.B. Pike. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
More, Thomas. 1997. Utopia. Mineola, New York: Dover Publications.
Valla, Lorenzo. 1970. De vero falsoque bono, ed. Maristella de Panizza Lorch. Bari: Adriatica Editrice.
Valla, Lorenzo. 1977. On pleasure, De voluptate. Trans. A. Kent Hieatt, and Maristella Lorch. New York: Abaris Books.
Zabarella, Franciscus. 1655. De felicitate libri tres, Padua.
Secondary Literature
Brown, Alison. 2010. The return of Lucretius to Renaissance Florence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cole, Alison. 2016. Italian renaissance courts: Art, pleasure and power. London: Laurence King.
Davies, M.C. 1987. Cosma Raimondi’s defense of Epicurus. Rinascimento 27: 123–139.
De Panizza Lorch, Maristella. 1985. A defense of life. Lorenzo Valla’s theory of pleasure. München: Fink.
Ebbersmeyer, Sabrina. 2010. Homo agens. Studien zur Genese und Struktur frühhumanistischer Moralphilosophie. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Ebbersmeyer, Sabrina. 2013. Passions for this life. In Rethinking virtue, reforming society: New directions in Renaissance ethics, 1400–1600, ed. Sabrina Ebbersmeyer and David A. Lines, 277–304. Turnhout: Brepols.
Gigante, Marcello. 1988. Traversari, interprete di Diogene Laerzio. In: Ambrogio Traversari nel VI centenario della nascita, a cura di Gian Carlo Garfagnini, 367–459. Firenze: Olschki .
Griffiths, Gordon, James Hankins, and David Thompson, eds. 1987. The humanism of Leonardo Bruni: Selected texts. Binghamton: Center for Medieval and Early Renaissance Studies.
Keßler, Eckhard. 2004. Ein Werk, ein Autor und ihre verwirrende Geschichte. In: Lorenzo Valla, Von der Lust oder Vom wahren Guten, ed. Peter Michael Schenkel, vii–lxxxi. München: Fink.
Kraye, Jill. 1988. Moral philosophy. In The Cambridge history of Renaissance philosophy, ed. Charles Schmitt et al., 303–386. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nauta, Lodi. 2017. Lorenzo Valla, The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2017 Edition), ed. Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/lorenzo-valla/
Palmer, Ada. 2014. Reading Lucretius in the Renaissance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Panizza, Letizia A. 1978. Lorenzo Valla’s De vero falsoque bono, Lactantius und Oratorical Scepticism. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 41: 76–107.
Panizza, Letizia A. 1995. Valla’s De voluptate ac de vero bono and Erasmus’ Stultitiae Laus: Renewing Christian ethics. The Erasmus of Rotterdam Society Yearbook 15: 1–25.
Quiviger, François. 2010. The sensory world of italian renaissance art. London: Reaktion Books.
Sarasohn, Lisa T. 1996. Gassendi’s ethics. Freedom in a mechanistic universe. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Schmitz, Claudia. 2004. Rebellion und Bändigung der Lust: Dialogische Inszenierung konkurrierender Konzepte vom glücklichen Leben (1460–1540), Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Surtz, Edward. 1957. The praise of pleasure: philosophy, education and communism in More’s ‘Utopia’. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vickers, Brian. 1986. Valla’s Ambivalent Praise of Pleasure: Rhetoric in the Service of Christianity. Viator: Medieval and Renaissance Studies 17: 271–319.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Ebbersmeyer, S. (2019). Pleasure in Renaissance Philosophy. In: Sgarbi, M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_621-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_621-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02848-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02848-4
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities