Skip to main content

Pleasure in Renaissance Philosophy

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy
  • 117 Accesses

Abstract

In Renaissance thought, we can observe a growing interest in and to a certain extent a rehabilitation of the notion of pleasure. This new interest can be understood as an expression of a general trait of Renaissance culture that showed a greater openness towards worldly pleasures than previous times, but it was also inspired by newly rediscovered texts containing Epicurean philosophy. In the course of the fifteenth century, new sources became available, such as Lucretius’ De rerum natura and Diogenes Laertius’ De vita et moribus philosophorum, which supported the growing engagement with Epicurean philosophy and a rehabilitation of his concept of pleasure. Humanists used different routes to rehabilitate the Epicurean notion of pleasure. One strategy was to reinterpret Epicurus’s position and to level the differences with other schools of thought. Another one was to use the Epicurean notion of pleasure in order to counter rigid Stoic moral philosophy and reinterpret Christian morality, as can be seen most prominently in the works of Lorenzo Valla and Erasmus of Rotterdam. Although Renaissance authors contributed to the recognition of Epicurean pleasure, it still took some time before Epicurus and the notion of pleasure became fully accepted in Western philosophical thought.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

Primary Literature

  • Abelard, Petrus. 1995. Collationes sive Dialogus inter Philosophum, Iudaeum et Christianum/Gespräch eines Philosophen, eines Juden und eines Christen (lt./dt.), ed. Hans-Wolfgang Krautz. Frankfurt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruni, Leonardo. 1928. Isagogicon moralis philosophiae. In Leonardo Bruni, Humanistisch-philosophische Schriften, ed. Hans Baron. Leipzig: B.G. Teubner.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Quevedo, Francisco. 1635. Epicteto y Phocilides en Españo con consonantes: Con el origen de los estoicos, y su defensa contra Plutarco, y la defensa de Epicuro, contra la comun opinion. Barcelona: Sapera.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ficino, Marsilio. 1576. Opera Omnia, 2 vols. Basel (repr. Torino 1959).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gassendi, Pierre. 1964. Opera Omnia, 6 vols. Stuttgart/Bad Cannstatt: Friedrich Frommann Verlag (repr. of Lyon 1658).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gassendi, Pierre. 1972. Selected works. Trans. Craig Brush. New York: Johnson Reprints.

    Google Scholar 

  • John of Salisbury. 1938. Frivolities of courtiers and footprints of philosophers, ed. J.B. Pike. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • More, Thomas. 1997. Utopia. Mineola, New York: Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valla, Lorenzo. 1970. De vero falsoque bono, ed. Maristella de Panizza Lorch. Bari: Adriatica Editrice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valla, Lorenzo. 1977. On pleasure, De voluptate. Trans. A. Kent Hieatt, and Maristella Lorch. New York: Abaris Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zabarella, Franciscus. 1655. De felicitate libri tres, Padua.

    Google Scholar 

Secondary Literature

  • Brown, Alison. 2010. The return of Lucretius to Renaissance Florence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, Alison. 2016. Italian renaissance courts: Art, pleasure and power. London: Laurence King.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, M.C. 1987. Cosma Raimondi’s defense of Epicurus. Rinascimento 27: 123–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Panizza Lorch, Maristella. 1985. A defense of life. Lorenzo Valla’s theory of pleasure. München: Fink.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebbersmeyer, Sabrina. 2010. Homo agens. Studien zur Genese und Struktur frühhumanistischer Moralphilosophie. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ebbersmeyer, Sabrina. 2013. Passions for this life. In Rethinking virtue, reforming society: New directions in Renaissance ethics, 1400–1600, ed. Sabrina Ebbersmeyer and David A. Lines, 277–304. Turnhout: Brepols.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gigante, Marcello. 1988. Traversari, interprete di Diogene Laerzio. In: Ambrogio Traversari nel VI centenario della nascita, a cura di Gian Carlo Garfagnini, 367–459. Firenze: Olschki .

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, Gordon, James Hankins, and David Thompson, eds. 1987. The humanism of Leonardo Bruni: Selected texts. Binghamton: Center for Medieval and Early Renaissance Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keßler, Eckhard. 2004. Ein Werk, ein Autor und ihre verwirrende Geschichte. In: Lorenzo Valla, Von der Lust oder Vom wahren Guten, ed. Peter Michael Schenkel, vii–lxxxi. München: Fink.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraye, Jill. 1988. Moral philosophy. In The Cambridge history of Renaissance philosophy, ed. Charles Schmitt et al., 303–386. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nauta, Lodi. 2017. Lorenzo Valla, The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2017 Edition), ed. Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/lorenzo-valla/

  • Palmer, Ada. 2014. Reading Lucretius in the Renaissance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Panizza, Letizia A. 1978. Lorenzo Valla’s De vero falsoque bono, Lactantius und Oratorical Scepticism. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 41: 76–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panizza, Letizia A. 1995. Valla’s De voluptate ac de vero bono and Erasmus’ Stultitiae Laus: Renewing Christian ethics. The Erasmus of Rotterdam Society Yearbook 15: 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quiviger, François. 2010. The sensory world of italian renaissance art. London: Reaktion Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarasohn, Lisa T. 1996. Gassendi’s ethics. Freedom in a mechanistic universe. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz, Claudia. 2004. Rebellion und Bändigung der Lust: Dialogische Inszenierung konkurrierender Konzepte vom glücklichen Leben (1460–1540), Tübingen: Niemeyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surtz, Edward. 1957. The praise of pleasure: philosophy, education and communism in More’s ‘Utopia’. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vickers, Brian. 1986. Valla’s Ambivalent Praise of Pleasure: Rhetoric in the Service of Christianity. Viator: Medieval and Renaissance Studies 17: 271–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sabrina Ebbersmeyer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Ebbersmeyer, S. (2019). Pleasure in Renaissance Philosophy. In: Sgarbi, M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_621-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_621-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02848-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02848-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics