Skip to main content

Aesthetics in Archaeology

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology
  • 114 Accesses

Introduction and Definition

The term “aesthetics” was coined in the eighteenth century by Alexander Baumgarten, who thought of it as “the science of sensible cognition” (Baumgarten 1961 [1750–1758]: §1, 107). As such, it concerns the study of how to think the sensible appearance (the look/sound/feel) of things when the focus is on their perceptual qualities. Immanuel Kant further added to this conception by proposing that aesthetic judgment involves a claim not based on an (objective) coming to know of the world but on a particular (subjective) feeling produced in the encounter with objects of perception. The feeling in question is produced when the faculties of imagination and understanding are in “free play” while provoked by various objects of perception (Kant 1790 trans. 1987: Pt. 1, Book 1, Section 9).

Accordingly, aesthetics is concerned with the claim that the particular wayin which things are present in our awareness may lead to a certain kind of object-related but subjective...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baumgarten, A.G. 1961 [1750–1758]. Aesthetica. Hildesheim: G. Olms.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coote, J., and A. Shelton, eds. 1992. Anthropology, art and aesthetics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, S. 2006. The philosophy of art. Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobres, M.-A. 2001. Meaning in the making: Agency and the social embodiment of technology and art. In Anthropological perspectives on technology, ed. M.B. Schiffer, 47–76. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forge, A. 1991. Hand stencils: Rock art or not? In Rock art and prehistory, ed. P. Bahn and A. Rosenfeld, 39–44. Oxford: Oxbow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gell, A. 1992. The technology of enchantment and the enchantment of technology. In Anthropology, art and aesthetics, ed. J. Coote and A. Shelton, 40–63. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gell, A. 1998. Art and agency: Towards a new anthropological theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosden, C. 2001. Making sense: Archaeology and aesthetics. World Archaeology 33 (2): 163–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heyd, T. 2003. Rock art aesthetics and cultural appropriation. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 61 (1): 37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heyd, T. 2007. Cross-cultural contact, etiquette and rock art. Rock-art Research 24 (2): 191–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyd, T. 2012. Thinking through aesthetics, art, and humanly made marks on rocks. In Blackwell’s companion to rock art, ed. J. McDonald and P. Veth. Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyd, T., and J. Clegg, eds. 2005. Aesthetics and rock art. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. 1790 (1987) Critique of judgment. Trans. W.S. Pluhar. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moro Abadía, O., and M.R. González-Morales. 2008. Paleolithic art studies at the beginning of the twenty-first century: A loss of innocence. Journal of Anthropological Research 64 (4): 529–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morphy, H. 1992. From dull to brilliant: The aesthetics of spiritual power among the Yolngu. In Anthropology, art, and aesthetics, ed. J. Coote and A. Shelton, 51–60. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morphy, H. 2005. Aesthetics across time and place: An anthropological perspective on archaeology. In Aesthetics and rock art, ed. T. Heyd and J. Clegg, 51–60. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, J. 2001. The aesthetics of depositional practice. World Archaeology 33 (2): 315–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soffer, O., and M.W. Conkey. 1997. Studying ancient visual cultures. In Beyond art: Pleistocene image and symbol, ed. M.W. Conkey, O. Soffer, D. Stratmann, and N.G. Jablonski, 1–16. San Francisco: California Academy of Sciences/University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomásková, S. 1997. Places of art: Art and archaeology in context. In Beyond art: Pleistocene image and symbol, ed. M.W. Conkey, O. Soffer, D. Stratmann, and N.G. Jablonski, 265–287. San Francisco: California Academy of Sciences/University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. 2003. Prehistoric art: The symbolic journey of humankind. New York: Harry Abrams.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziff, P. 1997. Anything viewed. In Aesthetics, ed. S. Feagin and P. Maynard, 15–30. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Heyd .

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Heyd, T. (2020). Aesthetics in Archaeology. In: Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51726-1_1622-2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51726-1_1622-2

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-51726-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-51726-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference HistoryReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics