Skip to main content

VR and AR for Future Education

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Mobile Teaching and Learning

Abstract

VR (virtual reality) and AR (augmented reality) have been introduced in education for many decades. VR and AR have been adopted in a wide range of educational programs, including astronomy, medical education, engineering, physics, geology, biology, chemistry, mathematics, geometry, language learning, arts, interactive books, training for new teachers, and many other disciplines. It was widely adopted in industries, such as tour guides, industrial design and maintenance, museum, laboratory simulation, and the most popular games. These technologies enabled educators to break the limitation of location and/or time in education and bring a totally new experience to learners. Many empirical studies indicate adoption of VR and/or AR in education had several positive influences on students’ learning engagement, understanding, process, and outcome. However, there are still challenges in adopting such technologies in a wide range of educational programs due to some barriers, such as high cost of devices, high cost for content development for educational purpose, training for academic professionals and educators to introduce these technologies in their teaching methodologies, etc. There are arguments for further investigation on design, development, and evaluation of VR and/or AR in education. When VR is combined with experiential learning theory, KOLB (a learning program combined with traditional Kolb theory and emerging technologies) brought a new experience to students and learners. The design and development process for KOLB is introduced in this chapter. With the increasing number of mobile technologies and decreasing costs on telecommunication consumption in recent years, VR and AR technologies are introduced in more applications and programs, which have influenced many industries. These technologies will lead education into a new phase and link current teaching and learning with future world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahn, D., and D.-H. Shin. 2013. Is the social use of media for seeking connectedness or for avoiding social isolation? Mechanisms underlying media use and subjective well-being. Computers in Human Behavior 29: 2453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ainge, D. 1995. Virtual reality in Australia. VR in the School 1 (1), East Carolina University, Greenville, N.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alhalabi, W.S. 2016. Virtual reality systems enhance students’ achievements in engineering education. Behaviour & Information Technology 35: 919–925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alhassan, R. 2016. Mobile learning as a method of ubiquitous learning: Students’ attitudes, readiness, and possible barriers to implementation in higher education. Journal of Education and Learning 5: 176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alkhezzi, F., and W. Al-Dousari. 2016. The impact of mobile learning on ESP learners’ performance. The Journal of Educators Online 13: 73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azuma, R.T. 1997. A survey of augmented reality. Presence Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 6: 355–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, A.S., A. Freeman, C. Giesinger Hall, M. Cummins, and B. Yuhnke. 2016. NMC/CoSN horizon report: 2016 K-12 Edition. Austin: The New Media Consortium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bredl, K., and W. Bösche. 2013. Serious games and virtual worlds in education, professional development, and healthcare. Hershey: IGI Global.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Castro, J.C. 2012. Learning and teaching art: Through social media. Studies in Art Education 53: 152–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C.J. 2006. The design, development and evaluation of a virtual reality based learning environment. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 22: 39–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane, T. 2016. Mobile VR in education from the fringe to the mainstream. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning 8: 44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cumming, T., C.D. Rodriguez, and I. Strnadova. 2013. Aligning iPad applications with evidence-based practices in inclusive and special education. In Pedagogical applications and social effects of mobile technology integration, ed. J. Keengwe. Hershey: Information Science Reference.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Agustino, S., ed. 2013. Immersive environments, augmented realities, and virtual worlds: Assessing future trends in education. Hershey: Information Science Reference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elby, R., M.B. Mahmoud, and G. Roy. 2017. The need for virtual reality simulators in dental education: A review. Saudi Dental Journal 29 (2): 41–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enyedy, N., J.A. Danish, and D. Deliema. 2015. Constructing liminal blends in a collaborative augmented-reality learning environment. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 10: 7–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, M. 2017. Augmented virtual reality: How to improve education systems. Higher Learning Research Communications 7 (1): 15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-López, Á., M.J. Rodríguez-Fórtiz, M.L. Rodríguez-Almendros, and M.J. Martínez-Segura. 2013. Mobile learning technology based on iOS devices to support students with special education needs. Computers & Education 61: 77–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, S. 2013. Using action research to investigate and improve hospice staff participation in workplace education. International Journal of Palliative Nursing 19: 302–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennig, N. 2016. Library technology reports. Chicago: American Library Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, C.-K., G.-J. Hwang, and C.-K. Chang. 2013. A personalized recommendation-based mobile learning approach to improving the reading performance of EFL students. Computers & Education 63: 327–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabugo, D., P.B. Muyingda, F.M. Masagazi, M. Mugagga, and M.B. Mulumba. 2016. Tracking students’ eye-movements when reading learning objects on mobile phones: A discourse analysis of luganda language teacher-trainees’ reflective observations. Journal of Learning for Development 3: 51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, P.W., Y.S. Shin, B.H. Ha, and M. Anisetti. 2017. Effects of avatar character performances in virtual reality dramas used for teachers’ education. Behaviour & Information Technology 36: 699–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kloepper, M.O., E. Zweiacher, P. Curtis, and A. Evert. 2010. Where’s the chicken? Virtual reality brings poultry science to the community college. Techniques: Connecting Education and Careers 85: 44–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D.A. 1984. Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. 2012. Augmented reality in education and training. TechTrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning 56: 13–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matzke, J., C. Ziegler, K. Martin, S. Crawford, and E. Sutton. 2017. Education and career development: Usefulness of virtual reality in assessment of medical student laparoscopic skill. Journal of Surgical Research 211: 191–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nissim, Y., and E. Weissblueth. 2017. Virtual reality (VR) as a source for self-efficacy in teacher training. International Education Studies 10: 52–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prensky, M. 2001. Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon 9: 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Primack, B.A., A. Shensa, J.E. Sidani, E.O. Whaite, L.Y. Lin, D. Rosen, J.B. Colditz, A. Radovic, and E. Miller. 2017. Social media use and perceived social isolation among young adults in the U.S. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 53:1, p1–8, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2017.01.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramya, G., and P. Madhumathi. 2017. Adopting Augmented reality for English language teaching and learning. Language in India 17: 352–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rattanarungrot, S., M. White, and P. Newbury 2014. A mobile service oriented multiple object tracking augmented reality architecture for education and learning experiences. Madrid, Spain: International Association for Development of the Information Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roedigeriii, H.L., and M.A. Pyc. 2012. Inexpensive techniques to improve education: Applying cognitive psychology to enhance educational practice. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 1: 242–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sankaranarayanan, G., B. Li, K. Manser, S.B. Jones, D.B. Jones, S. Schwaitzberg, C.G.L. Cao, and S. De. 2016. Face and construct validation of a next generation virtual reality (Gen2-VR) surgical simulator. Surgical Endoscopy 30: 979–985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shu-Chun, H., H. Sheng-Wen, S. Pei-Chen, and C. Cheng-Ming. 2017. To activate English learning: Listen and speak in real life context with an AR featured U-learning system. Journal of Educational Technology & Society 20: 176–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statista. 2016. Most popular Apple App Store categories in 2016 [Online]. Statista. Available: http://www.statista.com/statistics/166976/popular-categories-in-the-app-store/.

  • Sun, D., C.K. Looi, L. Wu, and W. Xie. 2016. The innovative immersion of mobile learning into a science curriculum in Singapore: An exploratory study. Research in Science Education 46: 547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sung, H.-Y., and G.-J. Hwang. 2013. A collaborative game-based learning approach to improving students’ learning performance in science courses. Computers & Education 63: 43–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsay, M., et al. 2010. A case study of cooperative learning and communication pedagogy: Does working in teams make a difference? Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 10: 78–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Våpenstad, C., E.F. Hofstad, L.E. Bø, E. kuhry, G. Johnsen, R. Mårvik, T. Langø, and T.N. Hernes. 2017. Lack of transfer of skills after virtual reality simulator training with haptic feedback. Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies 26: 346–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Virvou, M., and G. Katsionis. 2008. On the usability and likeability of virtual reality games for education: The case of VR-ENGAGE. Computers & Education 50: 154–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, D., D. Kennedy, and R.C.-W. Kwok. 2009. Does using mobile device applications lead to learning. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 20: 469–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • VREL. 2007. What is VR? [Online]. NC USA: Virtual Reality and Education Laboratory. Available: http://vr.coe.ecu.edu/.

  • White, I., B. Buchberg, V.L. Tsikitis, D.O. Herzig, J.T. Vetto, and K.C. Lu. 2014. A virtual reality endoscopic simulator augments general surgery resident cancer education as measured by performance improvement. Journal of Cancer Education 29: 333–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yiasemidou, M., J. De Siqueira, J. Tomlinson, D. Glassman, S. Stock, and M. Gough. 2017. Education and career development: “Take-home” box trainers are an effective alternative to virtual reality simulators. Journal of Surgical Research 213: 69–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yousafzai, A., C. Chang, A. Gani, and R.M. Noor. 2016. Multimedia augmented m-learning: Issues, trends and open challenges. International Journal of Information Management 36: 784–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y. 2012. An analysis of collaboration in the Australian and Chinese mobile telecommunication markets. Doctor of Philosophy (Economics), University of Wollongong.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu (Aimee) Zhang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Kencevski, K., Zhang, Y.(. (2019). VR and AR for Future Education. In: Zhang, Y., Cristol, D. (eds) Handbook of Mobile Teaching and Learning. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41981-2_136-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41981-2_136-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41981-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41981-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics