Skip to main content

The Use of Mobile Digital Technology and iPod Touches in Physical Education

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Mobile Teaching and Learning

Abstract

The use of mobile digital technology as a teaching and learning medium in physical education is gaining momentum. This chapter opens with an introduction to mobile digital technology in general, in education, and in physical education. It proceeds to examine the use of iPod touches to enhance teaching and learning in a physical education setting. While anecdotal evidence exists as to its use, greater empirical evidence is required to establish the efficacy of the iPod touch from a teaching and learning context across all physical education settings and with different ages and abilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ammah, J.O.A., and S.R. Hodge. 2006. Secondary physical education teachers’ beliefs and practices in teaching students with severe disabilities: A descriptive analysis. High School Journal 89(2): 40–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antoniou, P., V. Derri, E. Kioumourtzoglou, and E. Mouroutsos. 2003. Applying multimedia computer assisted instruction to enhance physical education students’ knowledge of basketball rules. European Journal of Physical Education 8: 78–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banville, D., and M. Polifko. 2009. Using digital video recorders in physical education to enhance and improve the learning environment. JOPERD 80(1): 17–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beddall-Hill, N., and J. Raper. 2010. Mobile devices as “boundary objects” on field trips. Journal of the Research Center for Educational Technology 6(1): 28–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaisdell, M. 2006. In iPod we trust. T.H.E Journal 33(8): 30–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blomqvist, M.T., P. Luhtanen, and L. Laakso. 2000. Validation of a video-based game: Understanding test procedure in badminton. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 19: 325–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyce, B.A., N.J. Markos, D.W. Jenkins, and J.R. Loftus. 1996. How should feedback be delivered? Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance 67(1): 18–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broida, R. 2009. SoundAMP turns an iPhoneiPhone into a hearing aid. http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-19512_7-10281062-233.html. Accessed 13 July 2009.

  • Calandra, B.D., R. Gurvitch, and J.L. Lund. 2008. An exploratory study of digital video editing as a tool for teacher preparation. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education (JTATE) 16(2): 137–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherry, G., Fournier, J., and Stevens, R. 2003. Using a digital video annotation tool to teach dance composition. Interactive Multimedia Electronic Journal of Computer-Enhanced Learning 5(1). http://imej.wfu.edu/articles/2003/1/01/index.asp. Accessed 14 June 2007.

  • Chirico, J. 2002. TiVo – The best innovation for diving since the cheese board. In Retrieved 12 May. Cited In Leight, Joanne, Dominique Banville, and Michael F. Polifko. 2009. Using digital video recorders in physical education. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance 80(1): 17–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu, L., and Chen, W. 2000. Multimedia application to motor skill learning. Proceedings of ED-MEDIA, 2, 1257–1258. Montreal, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, S. 2015. Examining the process of University- School- Community collaboration in an Irish sports studies and physical education context. Irish Educational Studies. Accepted in press. Published on line 7th April 201256. 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, S., and Fitzpatrick, T. 2015. Use of the iPod touch in skill acquisition programmes in a Sports Studies and Physical Education degree programme in Ireland. Study in progress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, S., R. O’Reilly, and S. Luttrell. 2012. Assessing the effects of integrating the reflective framework for teaching in physical education (RFTPE) on the teaching and learning of undergraduate sport studies and physical education students. Reflective Practice 13(1): 115–129 (15).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deakin, J.M., and L. Proteau. 2000. The role of scheduling in learning through observation. Journal of Motor Behavior 32: 268–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engel, G., and Green, T. 2011. Cell phones in the classroom: Are we dialling up disaster. Tech Trends 55(2):22–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, G., Palloff, R., Pratt, K. 2011. Using mobile technology to empower student learning. In 27th annual conference on distance teaching and learning, University of Winsconsin 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everhart, B.W., C. Harshaw, B.A. Everhart, M. Kernodle, and E. Stubblefield. 2002. The effect of physical education students using multimedia computers to improve physical activity patterns. The Physical Educator 59: 151–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorentino, L.H., and D. Castelli. 2005. Creating a virtual gymnasium. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance 76(4): 16–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, B. 2004. Video analysis of muscle motion. Strategies 17(4): 11–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frohberg, Dirk. 2006. Mobile learning is coming of age-what we have and what we still miss. DeLFI, Darmstadt, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, D.R. 2011. Elearning in the 21st century, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulimaris, D., M. Koutsouba, and Y. Giosos. 2008. Organisation of a distance postgraduate dance programme and the participation of students specializing in dance. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 9(3): 59–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin technology: iTalk – A recording app for your iPhone or 2nd gen iPod Touch. http://www.griffintechnology.com/products/italk. Accessed 13 July 2009.

  • Gubacs, K. 2004. Project-based learning: A student-centered approach to integrating technology into physical education teacher education. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance 75(7): 33–37. 43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gubacs-Collins, K., and S. Juniu. 2009. The Mobile Gymnasium. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance 80(2): 24–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrington, J., Herrington, A., Mantei, J., Olney, I., and Ferry, B. 2009. Using mobile technologies to develop new ways of teaching and learning. In New technologies, new pedagogies: Mobile learning in higher education, eds. Herrington, J., Mantei, J., Olney, I., Ferry, B., and Herrington, A., pp. 1–14. Wollongong: University of Wollongong. http://researchrepository.murdoch.edu.au/5227.

  • Kagohara, D. M., van der Meer, L., Ramdoss, S., O’Reilly, M. F., Lancioni, G. E., Davis, T. N., Rispoli, M., Lang, R., Marschik, P. B., Sutherland, D., Green, V. A., Sigafoos, J. 2013. Using iPods(®) and iPads(®) in teaching programs for individuals with developmental disabilities: A systematic review. Research in Developmental Disabilities, Vol 34(1), pp 147–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavakli, E., Bakogianni, S., Damianakis, A., Lamou, M., and Tsatsos, D. 2004. Traditional dance and elearning: The WebDance learning environment. http://www.aegear.gr/culturaltec/webdance/publications.htm. Accessed 14 Feb 2015.

  • Lai, K. W. 2008. ICT supporting the learning process: The premise, reality, and promise. In International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education, eds. Voogt, J., and Knezek, G., Vol. 20, No. 3, 215–230. Berlin, Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leijen, A., I. Lam, L. Wildschut, P. Robert-Jan Simons, and W. Admiraal. 2009. Streaming video to enhance students’ reflection in dance education. Computers & Education 52: 169–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leijen, Ä., W.F. Admiraal, E.M.M. Wildschut, and P.R.J. Simons. 2008. Students’ perspectives on e-learning and the use of a virtual learning environment in dance education. Research in Dance Education: Innovations in Arts Practice 9(2): 147–162. 16 p.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lunsford, J. 2010. Using handheld technologies for student support: A model. Journal of the Research Center for Educational Technology 6(1): 55–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martindale, T., S. Ryan, and S. Marzilli. 2001. Using digital cameras to assess motor learning. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance 72(8): 13–16, 18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mock, K. 2004. Teaching with tablet PCs. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges 20(2): 17–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papastergiou, Marina. 2010. Enhancing physical education and sport science students’ self-efficacy and attitudes regarding information and communication technologies through a computer literacy course. Computers & Education 54(1): 298–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papastergiou, M., V. Gerodimos, and P. Antoniou. 2011. Multimedia blogging in physical education: Effects on student knowledge and ICT self-efficacy. Computers and Education 57(3): 1998–2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patten, K. B., and Craig, D. V. 2007. iPods and english-language learners: A great combination. Teacher Librarian 34(5): 40–44. Presented at the annual conference on innovation and technology in computer science education, Canterbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrod. 2005. As cited in Äli Leijen, Wilfried Admiraal, Liesbeth Wildschut, and P. Robert-Jan Simons. 2008. Students’ perspectives on e-learning and the use of a virtual learning environment in dance education. Research in Dance Education 9(2): 147–162. doi:10.1080/14647890802087951.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popat, S. 2002. The TRIAD project: Using internet communications to challenge students’ understanding of choreography. Research in Dance Education 3(1): 21–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risner, D., and J. Anderson. 2008. Digital dance literacy: An integrated dance technology curriculum pilot project. Research in Dance Education 9(2): 111–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorrentino, R. 2000. A simulation of internet enhanced motor learning. Phd thesis, University of Calgary, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernadakis, N., E. Zetou, E. Tsitskari, M. Giannousi, and E. Kioumourtzoglou. 2008. Student attitude and learning outcomes of multimedia computer-assisted versus traditional instruction in basketball. Educational Information Technology 13(3): 167–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wise, John C., Roxanne Toto, and Kyu Yon Lim. 2006. Introducing tablet PCs: Initial results from the classroom. Frontiers in education conference, 36th annual. IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Crawford .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this entry

Cite this entry

Crawford, S., Fitzpatrick, P. (2015). The Use of Mobile Digital Technology and iPod Touches in Physical Education. In: Zhang, Y. (eds) Handbook of Mobile Teaching and Learning. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41981-2_72-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41981-2_72-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41981-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics